Sunday, 24 August 2014

Frank Appraisal of the WWE Network from Nasdaq





I found this great article on NASDAQ, where the WWE share's are traded, analysing the financial position of the WWE on the back of disappointing Network sales figures. It is interesting to read a view without the PR Spin included in WWE press releases about the same topic!


"WWE Network Numbers Put Company's Future at Risk
World Wrestling Entertainment   made a huge bet that its over-the-top streaming network would replace the revenue from its slowly dying pay-per-view business.
On the surface, the move seemed sound. WWE would cut out the cable companies and sell its network directly to consumers for around the price of buying two pay-per-view, or PPV, events a year. For $9.99 a month, fans would get all the year's big events, plus original programming and thousands of hours of archived shows. Logically, it made nothing but sense for fans and the business.
Unfortunately for WWE, logic and reality have not matched up -- the number of paid users for the network, which the company announced Thursday, is stunningly disappointing.
How bad was it?
When the network launched, WWE forecast that it would have 1 million subscribers in the United States by the end of the year. In April, just 42 days after launching, it had 667,287. In reality, however, the total was disappointing -- the period covered included the largest PPV event of the year, Wrestlemania.
Ordering Wrestlemania alone on traditional PPV costs roughly the same as a six-month subscription to WWE Network. The pricing should have made the hundreds of thousands of casual fans who buy only Wrestlemania sign up for the network. Instead, nearly 400,000 customers ordered Wrestlemania through their cable providers. That would be OK for WWE if those customers kept buying PPVs in the old way, but that has not been the case.
The company last week did not break down PPV sales between the U.S., where the network is available, and the rest of the world, where it isn't. But it did provide worldwide totals. Globally , WrestleMania did 690,000 buys, Extreme Rules did 108,000, Payback did 67,000, and Money in the Bank did 122,000. Those are huge drops from 2013, when WrestleMania  did 1.1 million buys, Extreme Rules  did 245,000, Payback  did 198,000, and Money in the Bank  did 223,000.
Those drops would be fine if the network was making up the difference, but it's not. During the same July 31 call, the company said it had 700,000 subscribers at the end of June. That's an increase of only 33,000 subscribers since April. While the original 667,000 subscribers more than made up for the revenue drop due to losing 410,000 Mania buys, the added 33,000 customers does not begin to cover the revenue drop from losing roughly 370,000 buys on the next three PPVs.
It's actually worse than that
The 700,000 number makes it very unlikely the company will reach 1 million U.S. subscribers by January. WWE first reported numbers on April 7, so the new number covers a little under three months, making the growth rate around 10,000 new customers a month. That would leave the company at 760,000 come January, but the actual number could be far worse.
Network subscriptions are supposed to be for a six-month minimum. That was enacted to stop people from singing up for a month to watch a certain PPV, then canceling. But people have found a way around that. Between April 7 and June 30, the network added 161,000 subscribers, but had 128,000 cancellations.
That should theoretically have been impossible, but customers found creative ways to skirt the rules, like stopping PayPal payments or canceling their credit cards. If people are willing to go to that length to get out of their commitment, what will happen in September when it comes time for people to renew?
With no major drawing card like Wrestlemania to keep casual fans interested, cancellations could lead to lower subscriber numbers come Jan. 1. That would be extremely bad news, as WWE has admitted there is no going back. During the call, the company said it expects the PPV business go to away in 2015. That means the network has to either make up the roughly $90 million the company made on PPV, or WWE has to make major changes to its operating model.
Can this be saved?
WWE knows it has a problem -- at least in the short term. It has already started making cuts, announcing a 7% workforce reduction and promised savings of $10 million in 2014 and $30 million in 2015.
"The cutbacks are so significant that they now feel they can break even on 500,000 subscribers in 2015 as opposed to 1.4 million subscribers," wrote Dave Meltzer of the Wrestling Observer newsletter.
There are some other signs for at least mild optimism. The company will begin rolling out the network to the rest of the world on Aug. 12, starting with 170 countries including Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Spain, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. A United Kingdom launch is planned for October, and although no date has been set, plans are also under way for Italy, Germany, and Japan, which have traditionally been large wrestling markets.
WWE CFO George Barrios told analysts in February that the network could attract as many as 3 million subscribers and become a "major source of future earnings growth" with as much as $150 million a year in cash flow, Deadline.com reported. That number seems like a dream, and while it may be possible in the long run, it's highly unlikely anytime soon.
It's hard to see the launch of the WWE Network as anything other than a disaster, but it's a disaster the company can recover from. WWE has done a lousy job explaining how the network works to the millions of fans who watch its Raw and Smackdown programs. It has corrected that in recent weeks by comparing it to Netflix , but the messaging must improve. People need to know they can watch the network on their television, and the company must increase the number of devices that stream the network to a TV.
To avoid losing subscribers to cancellations, the company also needs to make more content available on the network. The company owns tens of thousands of hours of its own shows, as well as libraries from countless out-of-business wrestling promotions. Very little of that content is on the network, which has led to even hard-core fans questioning whether it's worth $9.99 a month.
WWE has a good product. The network offers a tremendous value, and it makes sense for even casual fans. Ultimately that should lead to success, but the company will have to travel a very bumpy road to get there."

The original article can be found here:

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Summerslam 2014 thoughts and predictions!

Summerslam 2014 




Summerslam 2014 takes place in the Staples Center Los Angles, as it has done for the past 5 years, this PPV is headlined by Brock Lesnar Vs. John Cena, a feud which has predominantly been built via video packages and Paul Heyman. Here I will give you my thoughts and predictions on the event. 

Summerslam has 8 matches on the card this year. As of writing no pre-show match has been announced. 

  1. Rusev Vs. Jack Swagger in a "Flag" match. I personally do not feel much excitement for this match as at the previous PPV Jack Swagger lost clean to Rusev. So where can the story go from here? Chris Jericho Vs. Bray Wyatt is another match on the card which suffers from this, we have already seen the wrong person lose clean.  Rusev and Lana are WWE's most controversial characters, as seen at the "Battleground" PPV. Lana's infamous promo alluding to the MH17 disaster garnered bad press for WWE. But bad press is better than no press some people say, so maybe WWE will add fuel to the fire by having Rusev continue his winning streak. I actually believe Rusev will go toe to toe with Cena at some point which is why I believe he will not be losing any time soon.

  1. Dolph Ziggler Vs. The Miz for the Intercontinental Championship. I unfortunately think The Miz has this match won, which is a shame as the fans are just not invested in him. His return was embarrassing to watch, and he received a very lukewarm reaction, which is the opposite to the reactions Dolph Ziggler gets on a weekly basis. the Miz will win, as he has a movie to promote, which is why he returned then had the IC belt thrown on him in quick succession. Rumour has it Dolph was the original choice to win the battle royal for the IC title at Battleground but they went with Miz as he is the "Hollywood" superstar *laughs* they are trying to create right now. This leads me to believe Miz will successfully retain his belt for the upcoming "Marine 4" promotional drive.

    As for 
    Dolph Ziggler, his career over the past few years has been quite sad to watch. He is a fan favourite yet WWE refuse to let him reach the top when he has the tools to be a superstar. "Lets go Ziggler" chants regularly echo WWE arenas yet Zigglers only taste of main event gold have been blink and you miss it moment. His first WHC reign only lasting a few minutes. His second only a few months, some of that off TV with a concussion. I think part of the "Ziggler" problem is he is too good at "Selling" so he is used to make his opponents look good. This means he will always be on the losing end of matches. 

  1. Chris Jericho Vs. Bray Wyatt in a singles match. I hope to see Chris Jericho put Bray Wyatt over here, one thing Chris Jericho is very good for is putting over younger talent - for example losing clean to Fandango at Wrestlemania. How many superstars would put over a newbie like Fandango on the biggest stage of them all? This has been a very entertaining feud to watch. The Sister Abigail on the stage Y2J took was a realhighlight and the face to face sit down promo last week on Smackdown (8/8/14) was a classic. We have already seen Bray take one loss in this feud. which is why I hope to see Bray pick up a much needed PPV win at Summerslam.
     

    Bray Wyatt is a enigmatic character who has managed to capture the fans imagination and literally take the whole world in his hands. He has the tools to be a big superstar in WWE's main event scene, beating the man who beat Austin/Rock in the same night would be a nice thing for Bray to have on his resumé. 
  1. Brie Bella Vs. Stephanie McMahon. Former Womens Champion Stephanie McMahon comes out of retirement to face former Divas Champion Brie Bella. This feud has been intense with both women enjoying a night in the slammer. It was born on Stephanie McMahons dislike of the man she dubbed a B+ player Daniel Bryan and one fateful slap at Payback.
    This feud was made more personal on RAW (11/08/14) this week by the introduction of Daniel Bryans personal trainer "Megan". She claims to have had relations with Daniel which means he cheated on Brie, (Claire Lynch anyone? TNA viewers will get that reference) logic says Steph is paying Megan to say these things.  
    I believe the result of this match can go both ways depending on the result of the other divas match at 
    Summerslam. Brie Bella could win and go on to face the new Divas champion Paige. W
    ith Brie now using the yes lock we could see a submission match there. Stephanie McMahon could pick up the win by Nikki Bella turning heel on her sister and costing her the match. The reason for this being she blames her for the suffering she endured (the handicap matches) aswell as "Abandoning" her in favour of her husband.  
  1. Paige Vs. AJ Lee for the Divas Championship. "Turnabout is fair play" is the tagline I would use for this feud. On the post Wrestlemania RAW Paige debuted in shocking fashion by defeating the longest reigning divas champion in history also becoming the youngest divas champion of all time. AJ Lee disappeared from TV whilst Paige reigned  had some entertaining matches with the likes of Alicia Fox and Naomi, showing the world her title win was not a fluke. On the June 30th of RAW AJ Lee returned and defeated Paige for the belt, in the same way Paige won it. AJ Lee and Paige would go on to develop a rather cute friendship which ended on the July 21st RAW when Paige attacked AJ Lee post match. We have seen Paige go on to attack AJ Lee again by shoving her from the stage on the August 1st Smackdown. I think we will see Paige prove her dominance, and that WWE is her house, by winning the divas championship for a 2nd time.
     
     
  1. Roman Reigns Vs. Randy Orton. This match I think is missing a stipulation. The build up for this match has included Randy Orton RKO-ing Roman through a table and Randy blaming Roman Reigns for his lack of a title shot at Summerslam. I think Roman Reigns will win this match and have a strong showing as he is being groomed for a future WWE title run. I feel as though this match is a bit of a consolation, as it should have been Roman Reigns Vs. HHH. That match idea was abandoned in favour of Orton/Reigns. 

  1. Dean Ambrose Vs. Seth Rollins in a Lumberjack match. I feel as though this match is a bit of a missed opportunity with the MITB briefcase not being on the line. You would think Dean would want to extract revenge the biggest way possible by taking the thing his former shield mate values the most - his MITB case. I think Seth Rollins will win this match as WWE will not want Dean to get too popular.They would not want anyone outshining their pet project Roman Reigns at the moment. 
    This has been a very heated feud from the second Rollins turned on his former team mates. We have seen Ambrose banned from arenas before scheduled matches, have the deck stacked against him by the authority and pour coke and popcorn into Seths MITB briefcase. This is by far one of WWE's most entertaining feuds, and I honestly feel sad by the prospect of it ending any time soon. 

  1.  Brock Lesnar Vs. John Cena for the WWE Title. *sighs* I am just not invested in this match at all, the build for it has been very very lackluster to me. I did not really appreciate them building an important title match via video packages. Cena/Lesnar did not have a in ring confrontation together till only 6 days before the event.  The main thought I have about this match is, if Cena wins does that mean he is better than The Undertaker? Cena will have done what Taker could not. Lesnar is a "Part timer" on limited dates, so if he does win the belt, he will not appear week in week out. I have read reports that suggest Lesnar winning the belt, and keeping it through to Wrestlemania where he would defend against Roman Reigns with Roman  finally becoming Champion.  
    #BelieveInRomanReigns?

I see Summerslam 2014 providing a few potential matches of the year, with Dean Ambrose Vs. Seth Rollins and Bray Wyatt Vs. Chris Jericho strong contenders. I do have a fear Summerslam will not be a event for the "fans", with potential for Bray/Ambrose losses and Cena winning. The matches I am looking forward too the most are Ambrose/Rollins and Brie/Steph as each of those feuds have intense backstories with some amazing on screen moments/build. 

This has been a blog post by Ruth Barber, you can find me at xRuthStarx on twitter. Kindest Regards!


How to sell the WWE Network


As we head into Summerslam, WWE have just made the big announcement that the WWE Network is now available in 170 countries, with more soon to follow. This moment cannot have come fast enough for the WWE, who have been getting themselves into all sorts of financial trouble over lower than expected subscription numbers.
I’m sure the international launch of the Network will help matters some, but it seems clear to me that the WWE still have a lot to learn when it comes to marketing and selling the Network…

Selling damages the product


Here is a sales tip if you are having a tough time selling a product:
Stand between your product and the customer and repeat the price of the product over and over in their face until they buy it.
Did it work? No? That’s because it’s a STUPID idea.
Here is the fact the WWE have to face, telling fans that the network exists and how much it costs has netted them 700,000 buys in the US. It will probably get them another couple of hundred thousand internationally. It won’t get them anymore.
This is why Red Bull spends millions of pounds on live sports events. Because they know telling you that a can of Red Bull is £1.19 will not make you buy it. But watching am extreme sports icon jump 50ft in the air on a motor bike which the red bull logo on his back will make you think it’s cool and that probably will make you want to be seen drinking Red Bull later on.  
The next 700,000 subscribers will only buy the Network if it associated with a good product. Every time the commentary stop calling a match to tell us how much the network is. Every time they send out a legend to an expectant crowd, only to have them launch into a 10 minute Network promo to zero reaction, they are making their product worse. The less compelling and more annoying their product is, they less likely people are going to buy the Network.
The WWE must stop putting sales pitches for the WWE Network ahead of creating a quality product if they want to grow their customer base.

Network buys are not the same as viewer figures


I’m about to veer dangerously close to the dreaded Attitude era vs PG Era argument, but bear with me. The WWE have pushed themselves into the future by launching the Network, but their creative process is still in the past. The WWE cannot assume that the things that brought them viewers are the same things that will get them subscribers.
Here is the thing, at this point in time they are trying to sell a product credit card holders (read adults) which they have consistently been marketing to 10 year olds for several years.  In fact, when the WWE network subscription figures didn’t go as well as planned, they actually hit the reset button (see my previous blog article) and reverted back to the product they have been aiming at the younger audience.
This won’t work and there is a good reason for this. Getting people to switch channel in a TV package they have already paid for is a completely different proposition to asking people to pull out a credit card and commit to giving you money for your product.  In order for that to happen you have to give people a tailored product they actually care about and invest in. In the former situation the WWE could target children to get them to change the channel, in the latter you have to persuade an adult to like your product enough to buy it. That means changing the product to appeal to this demographic.
This goes double for the fabled “lapsed” members who, by their very nature, are likely to be in the older age demographic. The fact is if the WWE wants these people to subscribe, they need to admit that their ‘tried and tested’ format of PG entertainment is not so ‘tried and tested’ anymore.    
I’ve asked this question many times on Twitter and I still stand by it. John Cena as champion sells Merchandise and attracts children to watch the show on Sky, but does he sell Network subscriptions to adults? I would say the answer is no.
WWE need to stop being stubborn evolve their creative process to please an older demographic if they want to sell more subscriptions.

Give more to get more


So what can the WWE change? My first suggestion is that they never have Michael Cole, Jerry Lawler and JBL even attempt to sell the Network ever again. For a start there is an obvious problem with very uncool over 40 year olds trying to sell anything to young people. I would go as far as to suggest that if you surveyed fans almost no one would say they have purchased anything from the WWE on account of something Michael Cole has said.
But more importantly the commentary team should focus 100% on making every match and every wrestling promo as exciting and compelling as possible. When Michael Cole is done calling it, I should be left thinking Eva Marie vs Rosa Mendes was the greatest match of all time. Why? Because then I’ll go and buy the Network to see more Eva Marie matches.  A better product means more Network Sales.
My next suggestion is that when they do sell the network they should make it interesting and honest - give something to the fans to get something back from them. With the three hour RAW format they are struggling for content anyway, so they should pre-record a panel segment aimed at making people want to be part of the Network without patronising fans. It would look something like this:
When a great match ends Michael Cole announces they are heading over to the Network Lounge with Renee Young (you know, the hot attractive girl WWE fans actually want to listen too?), who is ready to interview WWE legend Ric Flair.
Renee Young announces that it is Summerslam week on the WWE Network and they will be playing special content during the week. She then begins an interview with Ric Flair.
Ric Flair discusses his top 5 Summerslam moments with cut away footage.
Renee Young announces all the Summerslam PPVs Ric Flair has mentioned will be played on consecutive nights in the run up to Sunday exclusively on the Network before Summerslam itself will be streamed live.
Renee ends by telling you how you can sign up to the Network and passing back to Michael Cole
When the segment ends you have given fans something interesting to watch, made them feel like there is a reason to sign up to the Network (beyond it costing nine ninety bloody nine) and succeeded in not ruining the rest of RAW.
At the moment the WWE's entire marketing strategy seems insanely ham fisted. Even more worryingly, there are signs they are actually becoming bitter and angry with fans for not subscribing, rather than looking at themselves to see what they can do better. For me, as someone who works in Marketing and PR, this is a recipe for disaster.
Conclusion

The next subscription announcement, coming on the back of the international launch and Summerslam will make very interesting reading. For me, the most fascinating aspect of all of this is seeing the WWE flounder between moving forward with an entirely new broadcast medium and almost pathological holding on to the past in all other areas. The level of stubbornness and lack of marketing knowledge they have so far shown has been staggering. The fact is the WWE must evolve their product, not just their broadcast medium, if they are to succeed going forward.

As always, check me out on Twitter @Kitiswrestling for more insights, opinion and general nonsense about wrestling!